In some sense, the canonical status of Bellow is already assured, even if the indubitable book is still to come. Bellow’s strengths may not have come together to form a masterwork, but he is hardly the first novelist of real eminence whose books may be weaker as aggregates than in their . Staples wasn’t sure how he’d play the rest of the improv.
In some sense, the canonical status of Bellow is already assured, even if the indubitable book is still to come. Bellow’s strengths may not have come together to form a masterwork, but he is hardly the first novelist of real eminence whose books may be weaker as aggregates than in their .Tags: Warwick Wmg DissertationGiver Essay SamenessBusiness Plan For Software DevelopmentPrintable Homework For KindergartenArgumentative Essay PdfU Of S Thesis DefenseThesis Statement For Communication Technology
Leader might have profited from heeding a couple of cautionary flags that were raised by someone in the know.
In 2017, Atlas, still smarting over the bruising reception of , in which he retraced his path and recounted every misstep and miscue in his dealings with Bellow to account for the bungling of what could have been a beautiful Johnson-Boswell partnership.
It would have sufficed for Leader to note the seesaw action of a major American author having a resounding hit and a mortifying flop in the same season, but for some buggy reason he decides to autopsy the causes for ’s demise, pages of production background that produce a groan when we get to the postmortem phase with a paragraph that begins: ‘The classicist David Grene, Bellow’s colleague at the Committee on Social Thought (an interdisciplinary Ph D programme at the University of Chicago, also a sort of high-powered academic .’ (‘Intriguing parallel’ is one of those phrases that makes one start counting the ceiling tiles.) ‘To extrapolate from Grene’s suggestion, one might compare Bellow’s spoof of psychoanalysis to Aristophanes’ spoof of philosophy in , both plays being simultaneously knockabout and deadly serious.’ Yes, one might, but why?
Since one play is a classic, the other a seldom revived clunker, this compare and contrast exercise can only spin its wheels, and Leader finally concedes that Bellow’s own estimation of his plays – ‘trifles’ – sounds about right.
‘When she read , Maggie immediately recognised that Bellow had turned her Frenchman into the black pickpocket. “You can use what you want,” he answered.’ Meaning: I can use what I want.
Bellow knew exactly what he was doing when he had the thief release the black mamba, the provocative shudder it would send. A grad student at the University of Chicago in the 1970s, Staples had devoured Bellow’s fiction and committed long passages to heart, sopped up all the local gossip about Chicago’s fedora’d laureate – idealised him something mad.
Haunted by the past, assaulted by the present, his world seems drawn in charcoal and ash.
The spectre of urban apocalypse preying on Sammler’s mind – race war, radical terrorism, collapsing infrastructure, rampant crime and psychosis in the streets, phone booths used as urinals, the entire city as a running sore – finds its locus in a soigné black pickpocket in a camel-hair coat who, as the pièce de résistance after isolating and robbing Sammler, forces the old man to look down as he exposes himself.
No American reader in the atomic-Afro black power tumult of the era gave two wags about some French dude’s organ, not in any psychosexual, symbolic shock value sense. – was the afterlife of this scene, which would trail him for much of his career. But he was also offended by and sore at a character’s descriptions of black people in , along with the novel’s use of the head-snapping phrase ‘sexual niggerhood’.
On his evening walks around Chicago’s Hyde Park, Staples would pass Bellow’s building, toying with the idea of lingering in the shadows and staging a confrontation.