Tags: Layout For Research PaperDefine Dissertation PaperDissertation Defense JokesDissertation Medical EthicsHomework Practice Workbook Algebra 1 Answer KeyConcepts And Categories Philosophical EssaysDefending A Masters ThesisApa Term Paper ExampleEssays On Theodor Herzl
Having your mind elsewhere is considered disrespectful or offensive – we all know the examples of a wife talking to her husband “Have you done the dishes?” “Yes, hun.” “Are you going to pick up that couch from the neighbours? ” “Yes, hun.” “Did you know our daughter turned into a goat?Some more stuff about me may be found here: Website I’m getting rather tired of people ranting on about the inferiority of text-based conversation such as MSN, ICQ, AIM, Yahoo! The prevailing opinion seems to be that face to face communication is hands down superior to online text conversations, because face to face includes body language, intonation, facial expressions, physical contact and so on.
— There are likely other unique advantages instant messaging offers to the realm of conversations that I haven’t thought of.
Possibly nothing I have said is in any way new and already established in books on communication or cognitivity or whatever.
We no longer have our attention tyrannized by our conversation partners – conversations are part of our information flow rather than being attention monopolizers.
This is likely also a reason why SMS is such a brutally popular function on cellphones, and a reason why instant messaging as a medium is unlikely to be replaced by computer mediated audio or video chat in the future.
IRC, of course, both allowed a message history (logfile) and kept your recent conversation on screen, but was harder to ‘get into.’ Still, it is my personal preferred IM application since it also allows many to many conversations in an extremely friendly and clear chat environment. Interesting and deep discussions become a thing of the unforgiving permanent past the moment they end.  Time to reflect and contemplate Have you ever had one of those conversations where every word counts? These pauses themselves may contain meaning for the other party that you really really did not want or mean to convey.
Anyway One of the funny things about sound is that you can’t really freeze and capture it like a photograph. Of course, they will be kept somewhat in our memories, where they will be immediately edited (raped) by our silly brains, forgetting certain parts and overemphasizing others. Job interviews, trying to save or break a relationship, heated debates with your parents (or children) reaching very dangerous climaxes and so on? Especially when emotions are involved, things can slip out in oral conversations that shouldn’t have. Text chatting is not immune to the same pitfalls and problems of face to face communication in this regard and it has some extra danger added to it concerning informationloss due to lack of bodylanguage, intonation and so forth.As such, in text chatting you can appear reasonable, calm, informed or insightful while in face to face communication you might seem rash, ignorant, offensive, indecisive, blunt or stupid.Most likely if you are such a person it will translate to text chatting as well, but at least you have a CHANCE to redeem yourself.” “Yes, hun.” *SMACK* Text chatting affords distractions.We can listen to music, read a Masters of Media blogpost, write a paper and eat dinner while still being able to keep a fruitful conversation going.In face to face conversations, you can claim things like the earth being spherical, WTC 7 being brought down in a controlled demolition or Scarlett Johansen having an awful taste in gala dresses but you will generally have trouble summoning evidence supporting these assertions. You can also get into frustrating situations like being unable to recall the name of a song even though you know a string of lyrics from it, or having forgotten the name of that action film with Nicolas Cage in some prison airplane. Not necessarily due to its innate features (though during trillian chat certain words can be highlighted showing an excerpt from a wikipedia entry) but because instant messaging generally happens online, unless you’re chatting on a closed off intranet, which is just plain stupid.The fact that instant messaging generally happens on a PC or Mac while being connected to the internet enables you to support whatever conversation you have with a wide variety of sources or illustrations.A bit later MSN got mainstream, and (quite revolutionary) allowed recently sent and received messages to be displayed in a single chatbox. It makes it more easier to address the things someone else has said earlier because no part of the conversation obfuscates another part, whereas in a linear sequence of spoken words earlier things said are prone to slip from your memory even though you wanted to comment on them.However, for some reason the earlier versions eschewed things like offline messaging and message histories. Most of us (at least the sane) don’t industriously record every conversation we have with people. This is why people often interrupt one another; to make sure the points they wanted to make are stated before they are forgotten. Taking pauses to think is not always appropriate, viable or possible.Efforts to bridge this gap, like the usage of emoticons in text-based conversation, merely constitute a poor substitute.Another notion going hand in hand with this view is the belief that it is ‘better’ that a person spends time outside of the house, meeting people face to face at bars, clubs, fraternities, sports teams and so on.