For every manuscript of my own that I submit to a journal, I review at least a few papers, so I give back to the system plenty.I've heard from some reviewers that they're more likely to accept an invitation to review from a more prestigious journal and don't feel as bad about rejecting invitations from more specialized journals.I usually consider first the relevance to my own expertise.
For every manuscript of my own that I submit to a journal, I review at least a few papers, so I give back to the system plenty.I've heard from some reviewers that they're more likely to accept an invitation to review from a more prestigious journal and don't feel as bad about rejecting invitations from more specialized journals.Tags: Inaugural Dissertation 1770Stanford Essay OpenersParchment Paper To Write OnExample Of An Introduction Of A Research PaperEssay Dream House DescriptionForeign Relations ThesisApa Format For Literature Reviews 6th EditionOrder An Essay OnlineArgumentative Essay How To Write
Second, I ponder how well the work that was conducted actually addresses the central question posed in the paper.Do the hypotheses follow logically from previous work? To what extent does the Discussion place the findings in a wider context and achieve a balance between interpretation and useful speculation versus tedious waffling? (Then, throughout, if what I am reading is only partly comprehensible, I do not spend a lot of energy trying to make sense of it, but in my review I will relay the ambiguities to the author.) I should also have a good idea of the hypothesis and context within the first few pages, and it matters whether the hypothesis makes sense or is interesting. I do not focus so much on the statistics—a quality journal should have professional statistics review for any accepted manuscript—but I consider all the other logistics of study design where it’s easy to hide a fatal flaw.Mostly I am concerned with credibility: Could this methodology have answered their question?If the answer to all four questions is yes, then I’ll usually agree to review.I am very open-minded when it comes to accepting invitations to review.Then, right in the Introduction, you can often recognize whether the authors considered the full context of their topic.After that, I check whether all the experiments and data make sense, paying particular attention to whether the authors carefully designed and performed the experiments and whether they analyzed and interpreted the results in a comprehensible way.The only other factor I pay attention to is the scientific integrity of the journal.I would not want to review for a journal that does not offer an unbiased review process.I'm more prone to agree to do a review if it involves a system or method in which I have a particular expertise.And I'm not going to take on a paper to review unless I have the time.