Tags: Dissertation Chapter 1Write An Essay About Nelson MandelaEssay Structure And OrganizationEssay About Everyday UseCivil War Research PaperResearch Paper First ParagraphWhat Is The Business PlanCollege Of Charleston EssayEssay On Introduction Of Television
This journal is one of many that take advantage of inexperienced researchers under pressure to publish their work in any outlet that seems superficially legitimate.They're very different from respected, rigorous journals like Science and In a several different cases, reporters have intentionally exposed low-quality journals by submitting substandard material to see if it would get published.When it comes to research papers and research paper topics, there are a lot of weird and bizarre topics and ideas that people have used in the past.
The paper above, titled "Get me off your fucking mailing list," has been accepted by the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology. The journal, despite its distinguished name, is a predatory open-access journal, as noted by io9.
These sorts of low-quality journals spam thousands of scientists, offering to publish their work for a fee.
In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations.
It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph: in response to spam from the journal.
You may find some of the great tips on our website.
If not, ask experts how to polish your paper on the following popular blogs.But these were soon followed by predatory publishers — largely based abroad — that basically pose as legitimate journals so researchers will pay their processing fees.Over the years, the number of these predatory journals has exploded.Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado, keeps an up-to-date list of them to help researchers avoid being taken in; it currently has 550 publishers and journals on it.Still, new ones pop up constantly, and it can be hard for a researcher — or a review board, looking at a resume and deciding whether to grant tenure — to track which journals are bogus.Journals are often judged on their impact factor (a number that rates how often their articles are cited by other journals), and Spears reports that some of these journals are now buying fake impact factors from fake rating companies to seem more legitimate.Over the past 12 months, three scholars—James Lindsay, Helen Pluckrose, and Peter Boghossian—wrote 20 fake papers using fashionable jargon to argue for ridiculous conclusions, and tried to get them placed in high-profile journals in fields including gender studies, queer studies, and fat studies.He submitted a less absurd, but deeply flawed paper about the cancer-fighting properties of a chemical extracted from lichen to 340 of these journals, and got it accepted by 60 percent of them.Using IP addresses, Bohannon discovered that the journals that accepted his paper were Earlier this year, I carried out a sting of a predatory book publisher — a company that uses the same basic strategy, but publishes physical books of academic theses and dissertations.The existence of these dubious publishers can be traced to the early 2000's, when the first open-access online journals were founded.Instead of printing each issue and making money by selling subscriptions to libraries, these journals were given out for free online, and The first of these journals were and are legitimate — PLOS ONE, for instance, rejected Bohannon's lichen paper because it failed peer review.